FUTURE PRIMATE
dotcomalldataback_futureprimate

Another victory for Kim Dotcom, he’s getting all Megaupload data back

There are some stories in the IT world that just don’t go away. Apple VS Samsung is one that springs to mind. The recent leaking of celebrity photos will be another that, even if unknowingly responsible, Apple won’t be able to get away from for some time. Another is the arrest of Megaupload’s Kim Dotcom and programmer Bram van der Kolk, and the seizure of all their electronic data and hardware by the FBI.

While the case has been lumbering on since January 2012, with Kim Dotcom pleading innocence ever since, another small victory for the Kiwi and his company has been registered. Kim Dotcom gets his (users) data back.

Police have been ordered to release all clones of computer and electronic devices taken in the initial 2012 raid. While a wording of “as soon as reasonably practicable” is all the timescale Dotcom has to go on, there’s one factor that is being continually overlooked; the users (legitimate, nothing to hide users) who lost data might actually be able to reclaim what was once, and is still theirs.

Going back to Dotcom – who could still be extradited on piracy charges – he will get all clones back unencrypted, with the Court of Appeal stating that only two nominated and named New Zealand police officers will be provided any/all encryption codes, adding that they:

“…maintain the confidentiality of any and all encryption codes provided to me; will not transmit the encryption codes electronically; and will not disclose the encryption codes to any other person or any other party, and in particular to any representative of the Government of the United States of America.”

No small victory in this case, which at the moment could swing either way depending on what side of the bed solicitors and judges get out of on the day. But let’s just remember, this isn’t just a victory for Dotcom and van der Kolk, but a victory for the users who used Megaupload’s service and had their data taken without any reasonable distinction between what was legally there and what was not.


Learn more here http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11320761

This entry was published on September 10, 2014 at 3:58 pm and is filed under Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: